CA CA - MEG Energy Chief Officer
| MEGEF Stock | USD 17.95 0.26 1.47% |
Insider
CA CA is Chief Officer of MEG Energy Corp
| Age | 54 |
| Phone | 403 770 0446 |
| Web | https://www.megenergy.com |
MEG Energy Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1361 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1361 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.2289 %, meaning that it generated $0.2289 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. MEG Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well MEG Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Cameron LLB | PrairieSky Royalty | N/A | |
| Fotis PGeoph | Spartan Delta Corp | N/A | |
| Matthew CFA | Athabasca Oil Corp | N/A | |
| Craig Martin | Spartan Delta Corp | N/A | |
| PGeol BSc | Surge Energy | N/A | |
| JuneMarie Innes | Tamarack Valley Energy | N/A | |
| Carol Brunschot | Kelt Exploration | N/A | |
| Andrew Bullock | Whitecap Resources | N/A | |
| Sanjib LLB | Tamarack Valley Energy | 47 | |
| Brendan Paton | Spartan Delta Corp | N/A | |
| Geraldine CFA | Spartan Delta Corp | 49 | |
| Cameron Danyluk | Athabasca Oil Corp | N/A | |
| Lynne Chrumka | Tamarack Valley Energy | N/A | |
| Colin Frostad | Tourmaline Oil Corp | N/A | |
| William Kirker | Tourmaline Oil Corp | N/A | |
| Christine Ezinga | Tamarack Valley Energy | N/A | |
| HanBom Hwang | Gear Energy | N/A | |
| CMA CPA | Cardinal Energy | 49 | |
| Scott Shimek | Tamarack Valley Energy | N/A | |
| Edward LLB | Gear Energy | N/A | |
| Ingram PEng | Gear Energy | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.23 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.14 |
MEG Energy Corp Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the MEG Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: MEG Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of MEG. The board's role is to monitor MEG Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. MEG Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, MEG Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Lyle Yuzdepski, Gen Legal | ||
| Darlene Gates, Chief Officer | ||
| David Granger, VP HR | ||
| Helen MBA, Director Relations | ||
| CA CA, Chief Officer |
MEG Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right pink sheet is not an easy task. Is MEG Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.23 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.14 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.15 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.26 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 5.24 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 298 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.58 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 35.84 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 7.81 X | |||
| Price To Book | 1.19 X |
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
Other Information on Investing in MEG Pink Sheet
MEG Energy financial ratios help investors to determine whether MEG Pink Sheet is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in MEG with respect to the benefits of owning MEG Energy security.