Correlation Between Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Samsung Electronics Co and Jeju Semiconductor Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Samsung Electronics with a short position of Jeju Semiconductor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor.

Diversification Opportunities for Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Samsung and Jeju is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Samsung Electronics Co and Jeju Semiconductor Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jeju Semiconductor Corp and Samsung Electronics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Samsung Electronics Co are associated (or correlated) with Jeju Semiconductor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jeju Semiconductor Corp has no effect on the direction of Samsung Electronics i.e., Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Samsung Electronics Co is expected to generate 0.71 times more return on investment than Jeju Semiconductor. However, Samsung Electronics Co is 1.4 times less risky than Jeju Semiconductor. It trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Jeju Semiconductor Corp is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,404,067  in Samsung Electronics Co on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,004,067) from holding Samsung Electronics Co or give up 15.68% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Samsung Electronics Co  vs.  Jeju Semiconductor Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Samsung Electronics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Samsung Electronics Co has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.
Jeju Semiconductor Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Jeju Semiconductor Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Samsung Electronics and Jeju Semiconductor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Samsung Electronics position performs unexpectedly, Jeju Semiconductor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jeju Semiconductor will offset losses from the drop in Jeju Semiconductor's long position.
The idea behind Samsung Electronics Co and Jeju Semiconductor Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance