Correlation Between Bet At and Litigation Capital

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bet At and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bet At and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between bet at home AG and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bet At and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bet At with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bet At and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Bet At and Litigation Capital

-0.33

Correlation Coefficient

Bet At  Litigation Capital

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bet and Litigation is -0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding bet at home AG and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Bet At is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on bet at home AG are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Bet At i.e., Bet At and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bet At and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon bet at home AG is expected to under-perform the Litigation Capital. In addition to that, Bet At is 1.01 times more volatile than Litigation Capital Management. It trades about -0.15 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  10,073  in Litigation Capital Management on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  177.00  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 1.76% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

bet at home AG  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

bet at home

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days bet at home AG has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Litigation Capital

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Pair Trading with Bet At and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bet At and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bet At position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.

The idea behind bet at home AG and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Directory module to find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges.