Correlation Between Inner Mongolia and Bank of China

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Inner Mongolia and Bank of China at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Inner Mongolia and Bank of China into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Inner Mongolia Furui and Bank of China, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Inner Mongolia and Bank of China and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Inner Mongolia with a short position of Bank of China. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Inner Mongolia and Bank of China.

Diversification Opportunities for Inner Mongolia and Bank of China

0.48
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Inner and Bank is 0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Inner Mongolia Furui and Bank of China in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of China and Inner Mongolia is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Inner Mongolia Furui are associated (or correlated) with Bank of China. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of China has no effect on the direction of Inner Mongolia i.e., Inner Mongolia and Bank of China go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Inner Mongolia and Bank of China

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Inner Mongolia is expected to generate 1.17 times less return on investment than Bank of China. In addition to that, Inner Mongolia is 3.16 times more volatile than Bank of China. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of China is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  490.00  in Bank of China on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  13.00  from holding Bank of China or generate 2.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Inner Mongolia Furui  vs.  Bank of China

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Inner Mongolia Furui 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Inner Mongolia Furui has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Inner Mongolia is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Bank of China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of China are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Bank of China is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Inner Mongolia and Bank of China Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Inner Mongolia and Bank of China

The main advantage of trading using opposite Inner Mongolia and Bank of China positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Inner Mongolia position performs unexpectedly, Bank of China can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of China will offset losses from the drop in Bank of China's long position.
The idea behind Inner Mongolia Furui and Bank of China pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals