Correlation Between Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Universal Insurance Holdings and Brockhaus Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Universal Insurance with a short position of Brockhaus Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital

-0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Universal and Brockhaus is -0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Universal Insurance Holdings and Brockhaus Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Brockhaus Capital and Universal Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Universal Insurance Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Brockhaus Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Brockhaus Capital has no effect on the direction of Universal Insurance i.e., Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital

Assuming the 90 days horizon Universal Insurance Holdings is expected to generate 1.19 times more return on investment than Brockhaus Capital. However, Universal Insurance is 1.19 times more volatile than Brockhaus Capital Management. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Brockhaus Capital Management is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,945  in Universal Insurance Holdings on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  55.00  from holding Universal Insurance Holdings or generate 2.83% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Universal Insurance Holdings  vs.  Brockhaus Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Universal Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Universal Insurance Holdings are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Universal Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Brockhaus Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Brockhaus Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's technical indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Universal Insurance and Brockhaus Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Universal Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Brockhaus Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Brockhaus Capital will offset losses from the drop in Brockhaus Capital's long position.
The idea behind Universal Insurance Holdings and Brockhaus Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets