Correlation Between Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Peoples Insurance of and Harvest Fund Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Peoples Insurance with a short position of Harvest Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund

0.31

Correlation Coefficient

Peoples Insurance  Harvest Fund

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Peoples and Harvest is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Peoples Insurance of and Harvest Fund Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Harvest Fund Management and Peoples Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Peoples Insurance of are associated (or correlated) with Harvest Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Harvest Fund Management has no effect on the direction of Peoples Insurance i.e., Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Peoples Insurance of is expected to generate 3.72 times more return on investment than Harvest Fund. However, Peoples Insurance is 3.72 times more volatile than Harvest Fund Management. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Harvest Fund Management is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  524.00  in Peoples Insurance of on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  243.00  from holding Peoples Insurance of or generate 46.37% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Peoples Insurance of  vs.  Harvest Fund Management

Peoples Insurance

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Peoples Insurance of are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Peoples Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Harvest Fund Management

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Harvest Fund Management are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Harvest Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Peoples Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Harvest Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Harvest Fund will offset losses from the drop in Harvest Fund's long position.

The idea behind Peoples Insurance of and Harvest Fund Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.