Correlation Between Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guangzhou Restaurants Group and Postal Savings Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guangzhou Restaurants with a short position of Postal Savings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings.

Diversification Opportunities for Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guangzhou and Postal is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guangzhou Restaurants Group and Postal Savings Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Postal Savings Bank and Guangzhou Restaurants is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guangzhou Restaurants Group are associated (or correlated) with Postal Savings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Postal Savings Bank has no effect on the direction of Guangzhou Restaurants i.e., Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Guangzhou Restaurants Group is expected to generate 1.54 times more return on investment than Postal Savings. However, Guangzhou Restaurants is 1.54 times more volatile than Postal Savings Bank. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Postal Savings Bank is currently generating about 0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,331  in Guangzhou Restaurants Group on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  458.00  from holding Guangzhou Restaurants Group or generate 34.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guangzhou Restaurants Group  vs.  Postal Savings Bank

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guangzhou Restaurants 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guangzhou Restaurants Group are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Guangzhou Restaurants sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Postal Savings Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Postal Savings Bank are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Postal Savings sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guangzhou Restaurants and Postal Savings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guangzhou Restaurants position performs unexpectedly, Postal Savings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Postal Savings will offset losses from the drop in Postal Savings' long position.
The idea behind Guangzhou Restaurants Group and Postal Savings Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance