Correlation Between Ambev SA and KEYBANK
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ambev SA ADR and KEYBANK NATL ASSN, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ambev SA and KEYBANK and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ambev SA with a short position of KEYBANK. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ambev SA and KEYBANK.
Diversification Opportunities for Ambev SA and KEYBANK
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Ambev and KEYBANK is -0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ambev SA ADR and KEYBANK NATL ASSN in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KEYBANK NATL ASSN and Ambev SA is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ambev SA ADR are associated (or correlated) with KEYBANK. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KEYBANK NATL ASSN has no effect on the direction of Ambev SA i.e., Ambev SA and KEYBANK go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ambev SA and KEYBANK
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Ambev SA ADR is expected to under-perform the KEYBANK. In addition to that, Ambev SA is 4.37 times more volatile than KEYBANK NATL ASSN. It trades about -0.17 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. KEYBANK NATL ASSN is currently generating about -0.19 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 9,774 in KEYBANK NATL ASSN on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (305.00) from holding KEYBANK NATL ASSN or give up 3.12% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 60.32% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Ambev SA ADR vs. KEYBANK NATL ASSN
Performance |
Timeline |
Ambev SA ADR |
KEYBANK NATL ASSN |
Ambev SA and KEYBANK Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Ambev SA and KEYBANK
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ambev SA and KEYBANK positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ambev SA position performs unexpectedly, KEYBANK can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KEYBANK will offset losses from the drop in KEYBANK's long position.Ambev SA vs. Fomento Economico Mexicano | Ambev SA vs. Boston Beer | Ambev SA vs. Carlsberg AS | Ambev SA vs. Compania Cervecerias Unidas |
KEYBANK vs. Broadleaf Co | KEYBANK vs. Bright Scholar Education | KEYBANK vs. Enel Chile SA | KEYBANK vs. United Utilities Group |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |