Correlation Between World Energy and Matthews China

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both World Energy and Matthews China at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining World Energy and Matthews China into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between World Energy Fund and Matthews China Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on World Energy and Matthews China and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in World Energy with a short position of Matthews China. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of World Energy and Matthews China.

Diversification Opportunities for World Energy and Matthews China

-0.02

Correlation Coefficient

World Energy  Matthews China

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between World and Matthews is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding World Energy Fund and Matthews China Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Matthews China and World Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on World Energy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Matthews China. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Matthews China has no effect on the direction of World Energy i.e., World Energy and Matthews China go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between World Energy and Matthews China

Assuming the 90 days horizon World Energy is expected to generate 4.74 times less return on investment than Matthews China. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, World Energy Fund is 1.96 times less risky than Matthews China. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Matthews China Fund is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,184  in Matthews China Fund on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  170.00  from holding Matthews China Fund or generate 14.36% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

World Energy Fund  vs.  Matthews China Fund

World Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in World Energy Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, World Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Matthews China

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Matthews China Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Matthews China may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with World Energy and Matthews China

The main advantage of trading using opposite World Energy and Matthews China positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if World Energy position performs unexpectedly, Matthews China can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Matthews China will offset losses from the drop in Matthews China's long position.

The idea behind World Energy Fund and Matthews China Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.