Correlation Between Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Verizon Communications and Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Infrastrutture Wireless. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless.
Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless
-0.06 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Bank and Infrastrutture is -0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Verizon Communications and Infrastrutture Wireless Italia in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Infrastrutture Wireless and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Verizon Communications are associated (or correlated) with Infrastrutture Wireless. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Infrastrutture Wireless has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Verizon Communications is expected to generate 1.14 times more return on investment than Infrastrutture Wireless. However, Bank of America is 1.14 times more volatile than Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest 3,997 in Verizon Communications on October 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (181.00) from holding Verizon Communications or give up 4.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Verizon Communications vs. Infrastrutture Wireless Italia
Performance |
Timeline |
Verizon Communications |
Infrastrutture Wireless |
Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless
The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Infrastrutture Wireless positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Infrastrutture Wireless can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Infrastrutture Wireless will offset losses from the drop in Infrastrutture Wireless' long position.Bank of America vs. Compagnie Plastic Omnium | Bank of America vs. Entravision Communications | Bank of America vs. Hyster Yale Materials Handling | Bank of America vs. Consolidated Communications Holdings |
Infrastrutture Wireless vs. Vinci S A | Infrastrutture Wireless vs. Larsen Toubro Limited | Infrastrutture Wireless vs. China Railway Group | Infrastrutture Wireless vs. China Railway Construction |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.
Other Complementary Tools
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences |