Correlation Between Bank of America and Consolidated Communications

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Consolidated Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Consolidated Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Verizon Communications and Consolidated Communications Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Consolidated Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Consolidated Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Consolidated Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Consolidated Communications

0.38

Correlation Coefficient

Bank of America  Consolidated Communications

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Consolidated is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Verizon Communications and Consolidated Communications Ho in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Consolidated Communications and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Verizon Communications are associated (or correlated) with Consolidated Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Consolidated Communications has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Consolidated Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Consolidated Communications

Assuming the 90 days horizon Verizon Communications is expected to under-perform the Consolidated Communications. In addition to that, Bank of America is 1.54 times more volatile than Consolidated Communications Holdings. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Consolidated Communications Holdings is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  410.00  in Consolidated Communications Holdings on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  40.00  from holding Consolidated Communications Holdings or generate 9.76% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Verizon Communications  vs.  Consolidated Communications Ho

Verizon Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Verizon Communications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Consolidated Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Consolidated Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Consolidated Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Consolidated Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Consolidated Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Consolidated Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Consolidated Communications will offset losses from the drop in Consolidated Communications' long position.

The idea behind Verizon Communications and Consolidated Communications Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.