Correlation Between Bank of America and Food Life

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Food Life at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Food Life into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Food Life Companies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Food Life and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Food Life. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Food Life.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Food Life

0.86

Correlation Coefficient

Bank of America  Food Life

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Food is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Food Life Companies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Food Life Companies and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Food Life. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Food Life Companies has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Food Life go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Food Life

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.33 times less return on investment than Food Life. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 1.09 times less risky than Food Life. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Food Life Companies is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,720  in Food Life Companies on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  420.00  from holding Food Life Companies or generate 24.42% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	98.46%
Values	Daily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Food Life Companies

Bank of America

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather fragile basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Food Life Companies

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Food Life Companies are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Food Life reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Food Life

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Food Life positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Food Life can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Food Life will offset losses from the drop in Food Life's long position.

The idea behind Bank of America and Food Life Companies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.