Correlation Between Bank of America and Blur

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Blur at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Blur into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Blur, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Blur and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Blur. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Blur.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Blur

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Blur is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Blur in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Blur and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Blur. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Blur has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Blur go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Blur

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 4.69 times less return on investment than Blur. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 4.01 times less risky than Blur. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Blur is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  16.00  in Blur on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  16.00  from holding Blur or generate 100.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Blur

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Blur 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Blur are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental indicators, Blur exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and Blur Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Blur

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Blur positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Blur can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Blur will offset losses from the drop in Blur's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Blur pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments