Correlation Between Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bridger Aerospace Group and Quantum Computing, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bridger Aerospace with a short position of Quantum Computing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing.

Diversification Opportunities for Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing

0.38

Correlation Coefficient

Bridger Aerospace  Quantum Computing

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bridger and Quantum is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bridger Aerospace Group and Quantum Computing in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Quantum Computing and Bridger Aerospace is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bridger Aerospace Group are associated (or correlated) with Quantum Computing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Quantum Computing has no effect on the direction of Bridger Aerospace i.e., Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing

Assuming the 90 days horizon Bridger Aerospace is expected to generate 2.55 times less return on investment than Quantum Computing. In addition to that, Bridger Aerospace is 1.15 times more volatile than Quantum Computing. It trades about 0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Quantum Computing is currently generating about 0.28 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  70.00  in Quantum Computing on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  692.00  from holding Quantum Computing or generate 988.57% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	92.06%
Values	Daily Returns

Bridger Aerospace Group  vs.  Quantum Computing

Bridger Aerospace

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bridger Aerospace Group are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly uncertain basic indicators, Bridger Aerospace showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Quantum Computing

Risk-Adjusted Performance

22 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Quantum Computing are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain fundamental drivers, Quantum Computing unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bridger Aerospace and Quantum Computing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bridger Aerospace position performs unexpectedly, Quantum Computing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Quantum Computing will offset losses from the drop in Quantum Computing's long position.

The idea behind Bridger Aerospace Group and Quantum Computing pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.