Correlation Between California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between California High Yield Municipal and Putnam Minnesota Tax, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in California High-yield with a short position of Putnam Minnesota. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota.
Diversification Opportunities for California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota
0.99 | Correlation Coefficient |
No risk reduction
The 3 months correlation between California and Putnam is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding California High Yield Municipa and Putnam Minnesota Tax in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Putnam Minnesota Tax and California High-yield is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on California High Yield Municipal are associated (or correlated) with Putnam Minnesota. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Putnam Minnesota Tax has no effect on the direction of California High-yield i.e., California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota
Assuming the 90 days horizon California High-yield is expected to generate 1.02 times less return on investment than Putnam Minnesota. In addition to that, California High-yield is 1.02 times more volatile than Putnam Minnesota Tax. It trades about 0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Putnam Minnesota Tax is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 880.00 in Putnam Minnesota Tax on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 11.00 from holding Putnam Minnesota Tax or generate 1.25% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
California High Yield Municipa vs. Putnam Minnesota Tax
Performance |
Timeline |
California High Yield |
Putnam Minnesota Tax |
California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota
The main advantage of trading using opposite California High-yield and Putnam Minnesota positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if California High-yield position performs unexpectedly, Putnam Minnesota can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Putnam Minnesota will offset losses from the drop in Putnam Minnesota's long position.California High-yield vs. Mid Cap Value | California High-yield vs. Equity Growth Fund | California High-yield vs. Income Growth Fund | California High-yield vs. Diversified Bond Fund |
Putnam Minnesota vs. Energy Basic Materials | Putnam Minnesota vs. Invesco Energy Fund | Putnam Minnesota vs. Icon Natural Resources | Putnam Minnesota vs. Adams Natural Resources |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.
Other Complementary Tools
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. |