Correlation Between Bank of America and United States

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and United States at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and United States into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and United States Steel, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and United States and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of United States. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and United States.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and United States

0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and United is 0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and United States Steel in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on United States Steel and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with United States. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of United States Steel has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and United States go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and United States

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 0.45 times more return on investment than United States. However, Bank of America is 2.23 times less risky than United States. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. United States Steel is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,902  in Bank of America on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (104.00) from holding Bank of America or give up 1.51% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  United States Steel

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Bank of America sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
United States Steel 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days United States Steel has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

Bank of America and United States Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and United States

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and United States positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, United States can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in United States will offset losses from the drop in United States' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and United States Steel pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators