Correlation Between Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ballistic Recovery Systems and Sphere Entertainment Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ballistic Recovery with a short position of Sphere Entertainment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment.

Diversification Opportunities for Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ballistic and Sphere is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ballistic Recovery Systems and Sphere Entertainment Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sphere Entertainment and Ballistic Recovery is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ballistic Recovery Systems are associated (or correlated) with Sphere Entertainment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sphere Entertainment has no effect on the direction of Ballistic Recovery i.e., Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Ballistic Recovery Systems is expected to under-perform the Sphere Entertainment. In addition to that, Ballistic Recovery is 2.74 times more volatile than Sphere Entertainment Co. It trades about -0.12 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Sphere Entertainment Co is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  4,100  in Sphere Entertainment Co on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (319.00) from holding Sphere Entertainment Co or give up 7.78% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ballistic Recovery Systems  vs.  Sphere Entertainment Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ballistic Recovery 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ballistic Recovery Systems has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.
Sphere Entertainment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sphere Entertainment Co has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable technical indicators, Sphere Entertainment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ballistic Recovery and Sphere Entertainment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ballistic Recovery position performs unexpectedly, Sphere Entertainment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sphere Entertainment will offset losses from the drop in Sphere Entertainment's long position.
The idea behind Ballistic Recovery Systems and Sphere Entertainment Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk