Correlation Between Citigroup and Strategic Allocation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Strategic Allocation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Strategic Allocation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Strategic Allocation Aggressive, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Strategic Allocation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Strategic Allocation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Strategic Allocation.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Strategic Allocation

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Strategic is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Strategic Allocation Aggressiv in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Allocation and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Allocation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Allocation has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Strategic Allocation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Strategic Allocation

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.98 times more return on investment than Strategic Allocation. However, Citigroup is 1.02 times less risky than Strategic Allocation. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Strategic Allocation Aggressive is currently generating about -0.28 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,895  in Citigroup on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  24.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 0.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Strategic Allocation Aggressiv

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Strategic Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Strategic Allocation Aggressive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Citigroup and Strategic Allocation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Strategic Allocation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Strategic Allocation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Allocation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Allocation will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Allocation's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Strategic Allocation Aggressive pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope