Correlation Between Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Government, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

-0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Goldman is -0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Government in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Government and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Government has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 6.34 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Citigroup is 6.34 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Government. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Government is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,788  in Citigroup on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,313  from holding Citigroup or generate 22.68% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Goldman Sachs Government

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Goldman Sachs Government 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Government has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Government pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets