Correlation Between Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Mackenzie Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced

0.91

Correlation Coefficient

Citigroup  Mackenzie Balanced

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Mackenzie is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mackenzie Balanced and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Mackenzie Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mackenzie Balanced has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 4.23 times more return on investment than Mackenzie Balanced. However, Citigroup is 4.23 times more volatile than Mackenzie Balanced Allocation. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mackenzie Balanced Allocation is currently generating about 0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,877  in Citigroup on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,272  from holding Citigroup or generate 21.64% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	98.46%
Values	Daily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Mackenzie Balanced Allocation

Citigroup

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Mackenzie Balanced

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Mackenzie Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Mackenzie Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mackenzie Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Mackenzie Balanced's long position.

The idea behind Citigroup and Mackenzie Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.