Correlation Between Citigroup and Marstons PLC
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Marstons PLC at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Marstons PLC into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Marstons PLC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Marstons PLC and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Marstons PLC. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Marstons PLC.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Marstons PLC
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Marstons is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Marstons PLC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Marstons PLC and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Marstons PLC. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Marstons PLC has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Marstons PLC go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Marstons PLC
If you would invest 6,092 in Citigroup on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 995.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 16.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Marstons PLC
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
Marstons PLC |
Citigroup and Marstons PLC Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Marstons PLC
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Marstons PLC positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Marstons PLC can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Marstons PLC will offset losses from the drop in Marstons PLC's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
Marstons PLC vs. McDonalds | Marstons PLC vs. Starbucks | Marstons PLC vs. Chipotle Mexican Grill | Marstons PLC vs. Compass Group PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.
Other Complementary Tools
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |