Correlation Between Citigroup and Rover
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Rover at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Rover into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Rover Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Rover and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Rover. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Rover.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Rover
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Rover is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Rover Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rover Group and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Rover. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rover Group has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Rover go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Rover
If you would invest 6,203 in Citigroup on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 716.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 11.54% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 1.56% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. Rover Group
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
Rover Group |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Citigroup and Rover Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and Rover
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Rover positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Rover can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rover will offset losses from the drop in Rover's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.
Other Complementary Tools
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon |