Correlation Between Consolidated Communications and Mastercard

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Consolidated Communications and Mastercard at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Consolidated Communications and Mastercard into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Consolidated Communications Holdings and Mastercard, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Consolidated Communications and Mastercard and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Consolidated Communications with a short position of Mastercard. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Consolidated Communications and Mastercard.

Diversification Opportunities for Consolidated Communications and Mastercard

0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Consolidated and Mastercard is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Consolidated Communications Ho and Mastercard in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mastercard and Consolidated Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Consolidated Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Mastercard. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mastercard has no effect on the direction of Consolidated Communications i.e., Consolidated Communications and Mastercard go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Consolidated Communications and Mastercard

Assuming the 90 days horizon Consolidated Communications is expected to generate 1.71 times less return on investment than Mastercard. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Consolidated Communications Holdings is 1.59 times less risky than Mastercard. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mastercard is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  43,536  in Mastercard on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,144  from holding Mastercard or generate 16.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Consolidated Communications Ho  vs.  Mastercard

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Consolidated Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Consolidated Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Consolidated Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Mastercard 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mastercard are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Mastercard reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Consolidated Communications and Mastercard Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Consolidated Communications and Mastercard

The main advantage of trading using opposite Consolidated Communications and Mastercard positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Consolidated Communications position performs unexpectedly, Mastercard can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mastercard will offset losses from the drop in Mastercard's long position.
The idea behind Consolidated Communications Holdings and Mastercard pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals