Correlation Between Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Consolidated Communications Holdings and Graham Holdings Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Consolidated Communications with a short position of Graham Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings.
Diversification Opportunities for Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings
0.89 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Consolidated and Graham is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Consolidated Communications Ho and Graham Holdings Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Graham Holdings and Consolidated Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Consolidated Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Graham Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Graham Holdings has no effect on the direction of Consolidated Communications i.e., Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings
Assuming the 90 days horizon Consolidated Communications is expected to generate 3.56 times less return on investment than Graham Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Consolidated Communications Holdings is 3.08 times less risky than Graham Holdings. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Graham Holdings Co is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 67,834 in Graham Holdings Co on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 22,666 from holding Graham Holdings Co or generate 33.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Consolidated Communications Ho vs. Graham Holdings Co
Performance |
Timeline |
Consolidated Communications |
Graham Holdings |
Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings
The main advantage of trading using opposite Consolidated Communications and Graham Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Consolidated Communications position performs unexpectedly, Graham Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Graham Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Graham Holdings' long position.Consolidated Communications vs. PLAYMATES TOYS | Consolidated Communications vs. New Residential Investment | Consolidated Communications vs. CI GAMES SA | Consolidated Communications vs. Media and Games |
Graham Holdings vs. SK TELECOM TDADR | Graham Holdings vs. MTI WIRELESS EDGE | Graham Holdings vs. Consolidated Communications Holdings | Graham Holdings vs. Entravision Communications |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.
Other Complementary Tools
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation |