Correlation Between Cars and United Parks

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cars and United Parks at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cars and United Parks into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cars Inc and United Parks Resorts, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cars and United Parks and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cars with a short position of United Parks. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cars and United Parks.

Diversification Opportunities for Cars and United Parks

0.87

Correlation Coefficient

Cars  United Parks

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cars and United is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cars Inc and United Parks Resorts in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on United Parks Resorts and Cars is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cars Inc are associated (or correlated) with United Parks. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of United Parks Resorts has no effect on the direction of Cars i.e., Cars and United Parks go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cars and United Parks

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Cars Inc is expected to under-perform the United Parks. In addition to that, Cars is 1.0 times more volatile than United Parks Resorts. It trades about -0.33 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. United Parks Resorts is currently generating about -0.13 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  5,864  in United Parks Resorts on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (321.00) from holding United Parks Resorts or give up 5.47% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Cars Inc  vs.  United Parks Resorts

Cars Inc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cars Inc are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Cars is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

United Parks Resorts

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in United Parks Resorts are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak forward-looking signals, United Parks may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Cars and United Parks

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cars and United Parks positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cars position performs unexpectedly, United Parks can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in United Parks will offset losses from the drop in United Parks' long position.

The idea behind Cars Inc and United Parks Resorts pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.