Correlation Between Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Goldman Sachs Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Calamos Dynamic with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs

-0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Calamos and Goldman is -0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Goldman Sachs Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Technology and Calamos Dynamic is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Calamos Dynamic Convertible are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Technology has no effect on the direction of Calamos Dynamic i.e., Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Calamos Dynamic is expected to generate 1.79 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Calamos Dynamic Convertible is 1.22 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Technology is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,745  in Goldman Sachs Technology on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,754  from holding Goldman Sachs Technology or generate 100.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Calamos Dynamic Convertible  vs.  Goldman Sachs Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Calamos Dynamic Conv 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Calamos Dynamic Convertible has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, Calamos Dynamic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Goldman Sachs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Technology are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Calamos Dynamic and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Calamos Dynamic position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Calamos Dynamic Convertible and Goldman Sachs Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated