Correlation Between Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Emerging Markets and Mfs Technology Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Emerging with a short position of Mfs Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology

0.12

Correlation Coefficient

Columbia Emerging  Mfs Technology

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Mfs is 0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Emerging Markets and Mfs Technology Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Technology and Columbia Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Technology has no effect on the direction of Columbia Emerging i.e., Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Emerging Markets is expected to generate 0.36 times more return on investment than Mfs Technology. However, Columbia Emerging Markets is 2.77 times less risky than Mfs Technology. It trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Technology Fund is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,402  in Columbia Emerging Markets on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (57.00) from holding Columbia Emerging Markets or give up 4.07% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Columbia Emerging Markets  vs.  Mfs Technology Fund

Columbia Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Columbia Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs Technology

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Mfs Technology Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's fundamental indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Pair Trading with Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Emerging and Mfs Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Technology will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Technology's long position.

The idea behind Columbia Emerging Markets and Mfs Technology Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.