Correlation Between Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Calvert Global Energy and Goldman Sachs Income, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Calvert Global with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs

0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Calvert and Goldman is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Calvert Global Energy and Goldman Sachs Income in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Income and Calvert Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Calvert Global Energy are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Income has no effect on the direction of Calvert Global i.e., Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Calvert Global Energy is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Calvert Global is 2.67 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Income. It trades about -0.16 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Income is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,588  in Goldman Sachs Income on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (56.00) from holding Goldman Sachs Income or give up 2.16% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Calvert Global Energy  vs.  Goldman Sachs Income

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Calvert Global Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Calvert Global Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Goldman Sachs Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Calvert Global and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Calvert Global position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Calvert Global Energy and Goldman Sachs Income pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios