Correlation Between Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble DRC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Colgate Palmolive with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

-0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Colgate and Procter is -0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble DRC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble DRC and Colgate Palmolive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Colgate Palmolive are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble DRC has no effect on the direction of Colgate Palmolive i.e., Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days horizon Colgate Palmolive is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. In addition to that, Colgate Palmolive is 1.07 times more volatile than Procter Gamble DRC. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble DRC is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  339,582  in Procter Gamble DRC on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2,669) from holding Procter Gamble DRC or give up 0.79% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Colgate Palmolive  vs.  Procter Gamble DRC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Colgate Palmolive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Colgate Palmolive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.
Procter Gamble DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble DRC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Colgate Palmolive position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Colgate Palmolive and Procter Gamble DRC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges