Correlation Between Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries Warrant, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbus McKinnon with a short position of CEA Industries. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries

-0.21
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbus and CEA is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries Warrant in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CEA Industries Warrant and Columbus McKinnon is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbus McKinnon are associated (or correlated) with CEA Industries. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CEA Industries Warrant has no effect on the direction of Columbus McKinnon i.e., Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Columbus McKinnon is expected to generate 173.19 times less return on investment than CEA Industries. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Columbus McKinnon is 100.73 times less risky than CEA Industries. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CEA Industries Warrant is currently generating about 0.26 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.00  in CEA Industries Warrant on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.91  from holding CEA Industries Warrant or generate 9.223372036854776E16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy31.25%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbus McKinnon  vs.  CEA Industries Warrant

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbus McKinnon 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbus McKinnon are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Columbus McKinnon displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
CEA Industries Warrant 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CEA Industries Warrant are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, CEA Industries showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbus McKinnon position performs unexpectedly, CEA Industries can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CEA Industries will offset losses from the drop in CEA Industries' long position.
The idea behind Columbus McKinnon and CEA Industries Warrant pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities