Correlation Between China Communications and Scientific Games

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Communications and Scientific Games at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Communications and Scientific Games into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Communications Services and Scientific Games, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Communications and Scientific Games and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Communications with a short position of Scientific Games. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Communications and Scientific Games.

Diversification Opportunities for China Communications and Scientific Games

-0.66

Correlation Coefficient

China Communications  Scientific Games

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Scientific is -0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Communications Services and Scientific Games in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scientific Games and China Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Communications Services are associated (or correlated) with Scientific Games. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scientific Games has no effect on the direction of China Communications i.e., China Communications and Scientific Games go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Communications and Scientific Games

Assuming the 90 days horizon China Communications Services is expected to generate 0.81 times more return on investment than Scientific Games. However, China Communications Services is 1.24 times less risky than Scientific Games. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Scientific Games is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  44.00  in China Communications Services on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4.00  from holding China Communications Services or generate 9.09% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

China Communications Services  vs.  Scientific Games

China Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Communications Services are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, China Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Scientific Games

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with China Communications and Scientific Games

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Communications and Scientific Games positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Communications position performs unexpectedly, Scientific Games can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scientific Games will offset losses from the drop in Scientific Games' long position.

The idea behind China Communications Services and Scientific Games pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.