Correlation Between Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cohen Steers Real and Goldman Sachs International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cohen Steers with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cohen and Goldman is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cohen Steers Real and Goldman Sachs International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Intern and Cohen Steers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cohen Steers Real are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Intern has no effect on the direction of Cohen Steers i.e., Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Cohen Steers Real is expected to generate 1.17 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Cohen Steers is 1.17 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs International. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs International is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,851  in Cohen Steers Real on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17.00  from holding Cohen Steers Real or generate 0.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cohen Steers Real  vs.  Goldman Sachs International

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cohen Steers Real 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cohen Steers Real are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Intern 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cohen Steers position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Cohen Steers Real and Goldman Sachs International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine