Correlation Between CryoLife and MBANK
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CryoLife and MBANK at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CryoLife and MBANK into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CryoLife and MBANK, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CryoLife and MBANK and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CryoLife with a short position of MBANK. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CryoLife and MBANK.
Diversification Opportunities for CryoLife and MBANK
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between CryoLife and MBANK is -0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CryoLife and MBANK in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MBANK and CryoLife is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CryoLife are associated (or correlated) with MBANK. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MBANK has no effect on the direction of CryoLife i.e., CryoLife and MBANK go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between CryoLife and MBANK
Assuming the 90 days horizon CryoLife is expected to generate 0.79 times more return on investment than MBANK. However, CryoLife is 1.26 times less risky than MBANK. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MBANK is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest 2,380 in CryoLife on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 420.00 from holding CryoLife or generate 17.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 99.22% |
Values | Daily Returns |
CryoLife vs. MBANK
Performance |
Timeline |
CryoLife |
MBANK |
CryoLife and MBANK Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with CryoLife and MBANK
The main advantage of trading using opposite CryoLife and MBANK positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CryoLife position performs unexpectedly, MBANK can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MBANK will offset losses from the drop in MBANK's long position.CryoLife vs. Abbott Laboratories | CryoLife vs. Medtronic PLC | CryoLife vs. Siemens Healthineers AG | CryoLife vs. Edwards Lifesciences |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..
Other Complementary Tools
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years |