Correlation Between Designer Brands and Macys

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Designer Brands and Macys at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Designer Brands and Macys into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Designer Brands and Macys Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Designer Brands and Macys and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Designer Brands with a short position of Macys. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Designer Brands and Macys.

Diversification Opportunities for Designer Brands and Macys

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Designer and Macys is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Designer Brands and Macys Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Macys Inc and Designer Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Designer Brands are associated (or correlated) with Macys. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Macys Inc has no effect on the direction of Designer Brands i.e., Designer Brands and Macys go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Designer Brands and Macys

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Designer Brands is expected to generate 2.19 times less return on investment than Macys. In addition to that, Designer Brands is 1.66 times more volatile than Macys Inc. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Macys Inc is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,534  in Macys Inc on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  276.00  from holding Macys Inc or generate 17.99% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Designer Brands  vs.  Macys Inc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Designer Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Designer Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.
Macys Inc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Macys Inc are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unsteady primary indicators, Macys may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Designer Brands and Macys Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Designer Brands and Macys

The main advantage of trading using opposite Designer Brands and Macys positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, Macys can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Macys will offset losses from the drop in Macys' long position.
The idea behind Designer Brands and Macys Inc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated