Correlation Between Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dreyfus International Bond and Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dreyfus International with a short position of Dreyfus Intermediate. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate.

Diversification Opportunities for Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate

0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dreyfus and Dreyfus is 0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dreyfus International Bond and Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dreyfus Intermediate and Dreyfus International is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dreyfus International Bond are associated (or correlated) with Dreyfus Intermediate. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dreyfus Intermediate has no effect on the direction of Dreyfus International i.e., Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate

Assuming the 90 days horizon Dreyfus International Bond is expected to under-perform the Dreyfus Intermediate. In addition to that, Dreyfus International is 2.28 times more volatile than Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal. It trades about -0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,270  in Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  6.00  from holding Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal or generate 0.47% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Dreyfus International Bond  vs.  Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Dreyfus International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Dreyfus International Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Dreyfus International is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Dreyfus Intermediate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Dreyfus Intermediate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dreyfus International and Dreyfus Intermediate positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dreyfus International position performs unexpectedly, Dreyfus Intermediate can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dreyfus Intermediate will offset losses from the drop in Dreyfus Intermediate's long position.
The idea behind Dreyfus International Bond and Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets