Correlation Between Dine Brands and Cadence Design

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dine Brands and Cadence Design at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dine Brands and Cadence Design into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dine Brands Global and Cadence Design Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dine Brands and Cadence Design and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dine Brands with a short position of Cadence Design. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dine Brands and Cadence Design.

Diversification Opportunities for Dine Brands and Cadence Design

0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dine and Cadence is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dine Brands Global and Cadence Design Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cadence Design Systems and Dine Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with Cadence Design. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cadence Design Systems has no effect on the direction of Dine Brands i.e., Dine Brands and Cadence Design go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dine Brands and Cadence Design

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Dine Brands is expected to generate 1.81 times less return on investment than Cadence Design. In addition to that, Dine Brands is 1.42 times more volatile than Cadence Design Systems. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Cadence Design Systems is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  27,376  in Cadence Design Systems on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,759  from holding Cadence Design Systems or generate 13.73% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Dine Brands Global  vs.  Cadence Design Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Dine Brands Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Dine Brands may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Cadence Design Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cadence Design Systems are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively abnormal basic indicators, Cadence Design unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Dine Brands and Cadence Design Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Dine Brands and Cadence Design

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dine Brands and Cadence Design positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, Cadence Design can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cadence Design will offset losses from the drop in Cadence Design's long position.
The idea behind Dine Brands Global and Cadence Design Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities