Correlation Between Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Dow Jones Industrial and ZOOZ Power Ltd, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Dow Jones with a short position of ZOOZ Power. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power.

Diversification Opportunities for Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power

0.75

Correlation Coefficient

Dow Jones  ZOOZ Power

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Dow and ZOOZ is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Dow Jones Industrial and ZOOZ Power Ltd in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ZOOZ Power and Dow Jones is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Dow Jones Industrial are associated (or correlated) with ZOOZ Power. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ZOOZ Power has no effect on the direction of Dow Jones i.e., Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Dow Jones is expected to generate 11.66 times less return on investment than ZOOZ Power. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Dow Jones Industrial is 5.02 times less risky than ZOOZ Power. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ZOOZ Power Ltd is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  205.00  in ZOOZ Power Ltd on October 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  45.00  from holding ZOOZ Power Ltd or generate 21.95% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	98.44%
Values	Daily Returns

Dow Jones Industrial  vs.  ZOOZ Power Ltd

Pair Trading with Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power

The main advantage of trading using opposite Dow Jones and ZOOZ Power positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Dow Jones position performs unexpectedly, ZOOZ Power can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ZOOZ Power will offset losses from the drop in ZOOZ Power's long position.

The idea behind Dow Jones Industrial and ZOOZ Power Ltd pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.