Correlation Between Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Intermediate Government Bond and Growth Strategy Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Intermediate Government with a short position of Growth Strategy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy.

Diversification Opportunities for Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy

0.63

Correlation Coefficient

Intermediate Government  Growth Strategy

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Intermediate and Growth is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Intermediate Government Bond and Growth Strategy Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Growth Strategy and Intermediate Government is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Intermediate Government Bond are associated (or correlated) with Growth Strategy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Growth Strategy has no effect on the direction of Intermediate Government i.e., Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Intermediate Government Bond is expected to generate 0.13 times more return on investment than Growth Strategy. However, Intermediate Government Bond is 7.44 times less risky than Growth Strategy. It trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Growth Strategy Fund is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  949.00  in Intermediate Government Bond on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (5.00) from holding Intermediate Government Bond or give up 0.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Intermediate Government Bond  vs.  Growth Strategy Fund

Intermediate Government

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Intermediate Government Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Intermediate Government is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Growth Strategy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Growth Strategy Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Growth Strategy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Intermediate Government and Growth Strategy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Intermediate Government position performs unexpectedly, Growth Strategy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Growth Strategy will offset losses from the drop in Growth Strategy's long position.

The idea behind Intermediate Government Bond and Growth Strategy Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.