Correlation Between Energy Technologies and Global Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energy Technologies and Global Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energy Technologies and Global Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energy Technologies Limited and Global Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energy Technologies and Global Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energy Technologies with a short position of Global Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energy Technologies and Global Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Energy Technologies and Global Health

0.22
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energy and Global is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Technologies Limited and Global Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Health and Energy Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energy Technologies Limited are associated (or correlated) with Global Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Health has no effect on the direction of Energy Technologies i.e., Energy Technologies and Global Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energy Technologies and Global Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Energy Technologies Limited is expected to under-perform the Global Health. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Energy Technologies Limited is 1.21 times less risky than Global Health. The stock trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Global Health is currently generating about 0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  14.00  in Global Health on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Global Health or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energy Technologies Limited  vs.  Global Health

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energy Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Energy Technologies Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Global Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Health are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, Global Health is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Energy Technologies and Global Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energy Technologies and Global Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energy Technologies and Global Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energy Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Global Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Health will offset losses from the drop in Global Health's long position.
The idea behind Energy Technologies Limited and Global Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas