Correlation Between Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ecclesiastical Insurance Office and Melia Hotels, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ecclesiastical Insurance with a short position of Melia Hotels. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels.

Diversification Opportunities for Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels

-0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ecclesiastical and Melia is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ecclesiastical Insurance Offic and Melia Hotels in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Melia Hotels and Ecclesiastical Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ecclesiastical Insurance Office are associated (or correlated) with Melia Hotels. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Melia Hotels has no effect on the direction of Ecclesiastical Insurance i.e., Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ecclesiastical Insurance is expected to generate 72.03 times less return on investment than Melia Hotels. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Ecclesiastical Insurance Office is 1.15 times less risky than Melia Hotels. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Melia Hotels is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  717.00  in Melia Hotels on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  32.00  from holding Melia Hotels or generate 4.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ecclesiastical Insurance Offic  vs.  Melia Hotels

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ecclesiastical Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ecclesiastical Insurance Office has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Ecclesiastical Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Melia Hotels 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Melia Hotels are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Melia Hotels unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ecclesiastical Insurance and Melia Hotels positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ecclesiastical Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Melia Hotels can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Melia Hotels will offset losses from the drop in Melia Hotels' long position.
The idea behind Ecclesiastical Insurance Office and Melia Hotels pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance