Correlation Between Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Emerging Markets and Guidemark Large Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Emerging with a short position of Guidemark Large. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large

0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Guidemark is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Emerging Markets and Guidemark Large Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guidemark Large Cap and Mfs Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Guidemark Large. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guidemark Large Cap has no effect on the direction of Mfs Emerging i.e., Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Emerging Markets is expected to under-perform the Guidemark Large. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Mfs Emerging Markets is 1.82 times less risky than Guidemark Large. The mutual fund trades about -0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Guidemark Large Cap is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,157  in Guidemark Large Cap on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7.00  from holding Guidemark Large Cap or generate 0.61% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Emerging Markets  vs.  Guidemark Large Cap

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mfs Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's forward-looking indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Guidemark Large Cap 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Guidemark Large Cap has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Guidemark Large is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Emerging and Guidemark Large positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Guidemark Large can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guidemark Large will offset losses from the drop in Guidemark Large's long position.
The idea behind Mfs Emerging Markets and Guidemark Large Cap pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements