Correlation Between Mfs Emerging and Great West

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Emerging and Great West at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Emerging and Great West into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Emerging Markets and Great West Loomis Sayles, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Emerging and Great West and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Emerging with a short position of Great West. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Emerging and Great West.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Emerging and Great West

-0.5

Correlation Coefficient

Mfs Emerging  Great West

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Great is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Emerging Markets and Great West Loomis Sayles in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Great West Loomis and Mfs Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Great West. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Great West Loomis has no effect on the direction of Mfs Emerging i.e., Mfs Emerging and Great West go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Emerging and Great West

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Emerging is expected to generate 3.85 times less return on investment than Great West. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Mfs Emerging Markets is 2.52 times less risky than Great West. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Great West Loomis Sayles is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,109  in Great West Loomis Sayles on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  782.00  from holding Great West Loomis Sayles or generate 25.15% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	99.8%
Values	Daily Returns

Mfs Emerging Markets  vs.  Great West Loomis Sayles

Mfs Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Mfs Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's forward-looking indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Great West Loomis

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Great West Loomis Sayles are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Great West is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Mfs Emerging and Great West

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Emerging and Great West positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Great West can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Great West will offset losses from the drop in Great West's long position.

The idea behind Mfs Emerging Markets and Great West Loomis Sayles pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.