Correlation Between Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Entravision Communications with a short position of Flowers Foods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods.
Diversification Opportunities for Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods
0.11 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Entravision and Flowers is 0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Flowers Foods and Entravision Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Entravision Communications are associated (or correlated) with Flowers Foods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Flowers Foods has no effect on the direction of Entravision Communications i.e., Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods
Assuming the 90 days horizon Entravision Communications is expected to generate 2.72 times more return on investment than Flowers Foods. However, Entravision Communications is 2.72 times more volatile than Flowers Foods. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Flowers Foods is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest 169.00 in Entravision Communications on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 67.00 from holding Entravision Communications or generate 39.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Entravision Communications vs. Flowers Foods
Performance |
Timeline |
Entravision Communications |
Flowers Foods |
Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods
The main advantage of trading using opposite Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Entravision Communications position performs unexpectedly, Flowers Foods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Flowers Foods will offset losses from the drop in Flowers Foods' long position.The idea behind Entravision Communications and Flowers Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Flowers Foods vs. MAVEN WIRELESS SWEDEN | Flowers Foods vs. Entravision Communications | Flowers Foods vs. Mobilezone Holding AG | Flowers Foods vs. DIVERSIFIED ROYALTY |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.
Other Complementary Tools
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments |