Correlation Between Ford and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and Goldman Sachs International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Ford and Goldman Sachs

0.15

Correlation Coefficient

Ford  Goldman Sachs

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ford and Goldman is 0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and Goldman Sachs International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Intern and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Intern has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ford and Goldman Sachs

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Ford Motor is expected to generate 2.5 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Ford is 2.5 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs International. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs International is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,042  in Ford Motor on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (39.00) from holding Ford Motor or give up 3.74% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.44%
Values	Daily Returns

Ford Motor  vs.  Goldman Sachs International

Ford Motor

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Ford Motor has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Ford is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Goldman Sachs Intern

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Pair Trading with Ford and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Ford Motor and Goldman Sachs International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.