Correlation Between Ford and Energy Services

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and Energy Services at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and Energy Services into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and Energy Services Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and Energy Services and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of Energy Services. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and Energy Services.

Diversification Opportunities for Ford and Energy Services

0.58
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ford and Energy is 0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and Energy Services Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energy Services and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with Energy Services. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energy Services has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and Energy Services go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ford and Energy Services

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Ford Motor is expected to generate 0.9 times more return on investment than Energy Services. However, Ford Motor is 1.11 times less risky than Energy Services. It trades about -0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Energy Services Fund is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,110  in Ford Motor on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (103.00) from holding Ford Motor or give up 9.28% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ford Motor  vs.  Energy Services Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ford Motor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ford Motor has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Ford is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Energy Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Energy Services Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Energy Services is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Ford and Energy Services Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ford and Energy Services

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and Energy Services positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, Energy Services can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Services will offset losses from the drop in Energy Services' long position.
The idea behind Ford Motor and Energy Services Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.