Correlation Between FactSet Research and Cadence Design

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FactSet Research and Cadence Design at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FactSet Research and Cadence Design into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FactSet Research Systems and Cadence Design Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FactSet Research and Cadence Design and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FactSet Research with a short position of Cadence Design. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FactSet Research and Cadence Design.

Diversification Opportunities for FactSet Research and Cadence Design

0.77
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between FactSet and Cadence is 0.77. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FactSet Research Systems and Cadence Design Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cadence Design Systems and FactSet Research is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FactSet Research Systems are associated (or correlated) with Cadence Design. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cadence Design Systems has no effect on the direction of FactSet Research i.e., FactSet Research and Cadence Design go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FactSet Research and Cadence Design

Considering the 90-day investment horizon FactSet Research is expected to generate 1.71 times less return on investment than Cadence Design. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, FactSet Research Systems is 2.24 times less risky than Cadence Design. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cadence Design Systems is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  27,313  in Cadence Design Systems on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,362  from holding Cadence Design Systems or generate 12.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FactSet Research Systems  vs.  Cadence Design Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FactSet Research Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FactSet Research Systems are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak fundamental indicators, FactSet Research may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Cadence Design Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cadence Design Systems are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively abnormal basic indicators, Cadence Design unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

FactSet Research and Cadence Design Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FactSet Research and Cadence Design

The main advantage of trading using opposite FactSet Research and Cadence Design positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FactSet Research position performs unexpectedly, Cadence Design can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cadence Design will offset losses from the drop in Cadence Design's long position.
The idea behind FactSet Research Systems and Cadence Design Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance