Correlation Between Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity Servative Income and Goldman Sachs Short, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity Conservative with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs

0.29

Correlation Coefficient

Fidelity Conservative  Goldman Sachs

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Goldman is 0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity Servative Income and Goldman Sachs Short in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Short and Fidelity Conservative is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity Servative Income are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Short has no effect on the direction of Fidelity Conservative i.e., Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity Servative Income is expected to generate 0.69 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Fidelity Servative Income is 1.45 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Short is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,001  in Fidelity Servative Income on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5.00  from holding Fidelity Servative Income or generate 0.5% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Fidelity Servative Income  vs.  Goldman Sachs Short

Fidelity Servative Income

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Servative Income are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Fidelity Conservative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs Short

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Short are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity Conservative and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity Conservative position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Fidelity Servative Income and Goldman Sachs Short pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.