Correlation Between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Series Floating, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Growth with a short position of Fidelity Series. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series.

Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series

0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Fidelity is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Series Floating in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Series Floating and Aggressive Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Growth Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Series. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Series Floating has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Growth i.e., Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series

Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Growth Allocation is expected to generate 4.43 times more return on investment than Fidelity Series. However, Aggressive Growth is 4.43 times more volatile than Fidelity Series Floating. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Series Floating is currently generating about 0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,108  in Aggressive Growth Allocation on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  65.00  from holding Aggressive Growth Allocation or generate 5.87% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Aggressive Growth Allocation  vs.  Fidelity Series Floating

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Aggressive Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Aggressive Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fidelity Series Floating 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

23 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Series Floating are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Fidelity Series is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Growth and Fidelity Series positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Growth position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Series can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Series will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Series' long position.
The idea behind Aggressive Growth Allocation and Fidelity Series Floating pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals