Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Kimberly Clark, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Kimberly Clark. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark

-0.12
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Kimberly is -0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Kimberly Clark in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Kimberly Clark and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Kimberly Clark. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Kimberly Clark has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to generate 2.29 times more return on investment than Kimberly Clark. However, FitLife Brands, is 2.29 times more volatile than Kimberly Clark. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Kimberly Clark is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,274  in FitLife Brands, Common on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (60.00) from holding FitLife Brands, Common or give up 1.83% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Kimberly Clark

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Kimberly Clark 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Kimberly Clark has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong primary indicators, Kimberly Clark is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Kimberly Clark positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Kimberly Clark can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Kimberly Clark will offset losses from the drop in Kimberly Clark's long position.
The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Kimberly Clark pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements