Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Mill City

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Mill City at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Mill City into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Mill City Ventures, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Mill City and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Mill City. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Mill City.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Mill City

0.14

Correlation Coefficient

FitLife Brands,  Mill City

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Mill is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Mill City Ventures in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mill City Ventures and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Mill City. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mill City Ventures has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Mill City go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Mill City

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to under-perform the Mill City. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, FitLife Brands, Common is 1.36 times less risky than Mill City. The stock trades about -0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Mill City Ventures is currently generating about 0.18 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  182.00  in Mill City Ventures on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17.00  from holding Mill City Ventures or generate 9.34% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Mill City Ventures

FitLife Brands, Common

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Mill City Ventures

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Mill City Ventures has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Mill City

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Mill City positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Mill City can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mill City will offset losses from the drop in Mill City's long position.

The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Mill City Ventures pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.